On 03/27/24 at 06:21pm, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:56:45PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Nobody calls calc_memmap_size() now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks like I replied to patch 6/6 twice by mistake and missed this one.
Thanks for your careful reviewing.
>
> > ---
> > mm/mm_init.c | 20 --------------------
> > 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> > index 7f71e56e83f3..e269a724f70e 100644
> > --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> > +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> > @@ -1331,26 +1331,6 @@ static void __init calculate_node_totalpages(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> > pr_debug("On node %d totalpages: %lu\n", pgdat->node_id, realtotalpages);
> > }
> >
> > -static unsigned long __init calc_memmap_size(unsigned long spanned_pages,
> > - unsigned long present_pages)
> > -{
> > - unsigned long pages = spanned_pages;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Provide a more accurate estimation if there are holes within
> > - * the zone and SPARSEMEM is in use. If there are holes within the
> > - * zone, each populated memory region may cost us one or two extra
> > - * memmap pages due to alignment because memmap pages for each
> > - * populated regions may not be naturally aligned on page boundary.
> > - * So the (present_pages >> 4) heuristic is a tradeoff for that.
> > - */
> > - if (spanned_pages > present_pages + (present_pages >> 4) &&
> > - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM))
> > - pages = present_pages;
> > -
> > - return PAGE_ALIGN(pages * sizeof(struct page)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > -}
> > -
> > #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> > static void pgdat_init_split_queue(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
>
