Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] mm/memory: Use ptep_get_lockless_norecency() for orig_pte

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.02.24 13:17, Ryan Roberts wrote:
Let's convert handle_pte_fault()'s use of ptep_get_lockless() to
ptep_get_lockless_norecency() to save orig_pte.

There are a number of places that follow this model:

     orig_pte = ptep_get_lockless(ptep)
     ...
     <lock>
     if (!pte_same(orig_pte, ptep_get(ptep)))
             // RACE!
     ...
     <unlock>

So we need to be careful to convert all of those to use
pte_same_norecency() so that the access and dirty bits are excluded from
the comparison.

Additionally there are a couple of places that genuinely rely on the
access and dirty bits of orig_pte, but with some careful refactoring, we
can use ptep_get() once we are holding the lock to achieve equivalent
logic.

We really should document that changed behavior somewhere where it can be easily found: that orig_pte might have incomplete/stale accessed/dirty information.


@@ -5343,7 +5356,7 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
  						 vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
  		if (unlikely(!vmf->pte))
  			return 0;
-		vmf->orig_pte = ptep_get_lockless(vmf->pte);
+		vmf->orig_pte = ptep_get_lockless_norecency(vmf->pte);
  		vmf->flags |= FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID;

  		if (pte_none(vmf->orig_pte)) {
@@ -5363,7 +5376,7 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)

  	spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
  	entry = vmf->orig_pte;
-	if (unlikely(!pte_same(ptep_get(vmf->pte), entry))) {
+	if (unlikely(!pte_same_norecency(ptep_get(vmf->pte), entry))) {
  		update_mmu_tlb(vmf->vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
  		goto unlock;

I was wondering about the following:

Assume the PTE is not dirty.

Thread 1 does

vmf->orig_pte = ptep_get_lockless_norecency(vmf->pte)
/* not dirty */

/* Now, thread 2 ends up setting the PTE dirty under PT lock. */

spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
entry = vmf->orig_pte;
if (unlikely(!pte_same(ptep_get(vmf->pte), entry))) {
	...
}
...
entry = pte_mkyoung(entry);
if (ptep_set_access_flags(vmf->vma, ...)
...
pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);


Generic ptep_set_access_flags() will do another pte_same() check and realize "hey, there was a change!" let's update the PTE!

set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, address, ptep, entry);

would overwrite the dirty bit set by thread 2.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux