On 15.02.24 13:17, Ryan Roberts wrote:
Let's convert handle_pte_fault()'s use of ptep_get_lockless() to
ptep_get_lockless_norecency() to save orig_pte.
There are a number of places that follow this model:
orig_pte = ptep_get_lockless(ptep)
...
<lock>
if (!pte_same(orig_pte, ptep_get(ptep)))
// RACE!
...
<unlock>
So we need to be careful to convert all of those to use
pte_same_norecency() so that the access and dirty bits are excluded from
the comparison.
Additionally there are a couple of places that genuinely rely on the
access and dirty bits of orig_pte, but with some careful refactoring, we
can use ptep_get() once we are holding the lock to achieve equivalent
logic.
We really should document that changed behavior somewhere where it can
be easily found: that orig_pte might have incomplete/stale
accessed/dirty information.
@@ -5343,7 +5356,7 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
if (unlikely(!vmf->pte))
return 0;
- vmf->orig_pte = ptep_get_lockless(vmf->pte);
+ vmf->orig_pte = ptep_get_lockless_norecency(vmf->pte);
vmf->flags |= FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID;
if (pte_none(vmf->orig_pte)) {
@@ -5363,7 +5376,7 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
entry = vmf->orig_pte;
- if (unlikely(!pte_same(ptep_get(vmf->pte), entry))) {
+ if (unlikely(!pte_same_norecency(ptep_get(vmf->pte), entry))) {
update_mmu_tlb(vmf->vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
goto unlock;
I was wondering about the following:
Assume the PTE is not dirty.
Thread 1 does
vmf->orig_pte = ptep_get_lockless_norecency(vmf->pte)
/* not dirty */
/* Now, thread 2 ends up setting the PTE dirty under PT lock. */
spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
entry = vmf->orig_pte;
if (unlikely(!pte_same(ptep_get(vmf->pte), entry))) {
...
}
...
entry = pte_mkyoung(entry);
if (ptep_set_access_flags(vmf->vma, ...)
...
pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
Generic ptep_set_access_flags() will do another pte_same() check and
realize "hey, there was a change!" let's update the PTE!
set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, address, ptep, entry);
would overwrite the dirty bit set by thread 2.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb