On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:27:34 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@xxxxxx> wrote: [...] > OK. It could be a matter of preference and the current filter is already > in the mainline so I won't insist more. Thank you for accepting my humble suggestion. [...] > > I'd prefer improving the documents or > > user-space tool and keep the kernel code simple. > > OK. I will see if there is a way to improve damo tool for this instead > of making changes on the kernel side. Looking forward! [...] > Yeah, I made this thread too much about filter naming discussion rather > than tiered memory support. No problem at all. Thank you for keeping this productive discussion. [...] > Thanks again for your feedback. That's my pleasure :) Thanks, SJ [...]
