On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:06 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:00 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > sg_init_one() relies on linearly mapped low memory for the safe
> > utilization of virt_to_page(). Consequently, we have two choices:
> > either employ kmap_to_page() alongside sg_set_page(), or resort to
> > copying high memory contents to a temporary buffer residing in low
> > memory. However, considering the introduction of the WARN_ON_ONCE
> > in commit ef6e06b2ef870 ("highmem: fix kmap_to_page() for
> > kmap_local_page() addresses"), which specifically addresses high
> > memory concerns, it appears that memcpy remains the sole viable
> > option.
> >
> > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+adbc983a1588b7805de3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000bbb3d80613f243a6@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > Fixes: 270700dd06ca ("mm/zswap: remove the memcpy if acomp is not sleepable")
> > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/zswap.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> > index 9dec853647c8..17bf6d87b274 100644
> > --- a/mm/zswap.c
> > +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> > @@ -1080,7 +1080,8 @@ static void zswap_decompress(struct zswap_entry *entry, struct page *page)
> > mutex_lock(&acomp_ctx->mutex);
> >
> > src = zpool_map_handle(zpool, entry->handle, ZPOOL_MM_RO);
> > - if (acomp_ctx->is_sleepable && !zpool_can_sleep_mapped(zpool)) {
> > + if ((acomp_ctx->is_sleepable && !zpool_can_sleep_mapped(zpool)) ||
> > + !virt_addr_valid(src)) {
>
>
> Would it be better to explicitly check is_kmap_addr() here? I am
> particularly worried about hiding a bug where the returned address
> from zpool_map_handle() is not a kmap address, but also not a valid
> linear mapping address.
>
> If we use is_kmap_addr() here, then the virt_addr_valid() check in
> sg_init_one() will catch any non-kmap non-linear mapping addresses.
> WDYT? Am I being paranoid? :)
we have a possibility that a userspace buffer or vmalloc address is given to
sg_init_one, then it is non-kmap non-linear. but is it possible someday some
people return a vmalloc/vmap address from zpool_map_handle() in the future?
then we still need !virt_addr_valid().
>
> Also, I think a comment would be nice to explain the cases where we
> need to use a temporary buffer since we have two different cases now.
that makes sense.
>
> >
> > memcpy(acomp_ctx->buffer, src, entry->length);
> > src = acomp_ctx->buffer;
> > zpool_unmap_handle(zpool, entry->handle);
> > @@ -1094,7 +1095,7 @@ static void zswap_decompress(struct zswap_entry *entry, struct page *page)
> > BUG_ON(acomp_ctx->req->dlen != PAGE_SIZE);
> > mutex_unlock(&acomp_ctx->mutex);
> >
> > - if (!acomp_ctx->is_sleepable || zpool_can_sleep_mapped(zpool))
> > + if (src != acomp_ctx->buffer)
> > zpool_unmap_handle(zpool, entry->handle);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
