Commit 8c138b only sits in Pekka's and linux-next tree now, which tries to replace obj_size(cachep) with cachep->object_size, but has a typo in kmem_cache_free() by using "size" instead of "object_size", which casues some regressions. Reported-and-tested-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> --- mm/slab.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index 64c3d03..605b3b7 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -3890,7 +3890,7 @@ void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void *objp) unsigned long flags; local_irq_save(flags); - debug_check_no_locks_freed(objp, cachep->size); + debug_check_no_locks_freed(objp, cachep->object_size); if (!(cachep->flags & SLAB_DEBUG_OBJECTS)) debug_check_no_obj_freed(objp, cachep->object_size); __cache_free(cachep, objp, __builtin_return_address(0)); -- 1.7.10 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>