On 04/03/2024 08:13, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Commit d0637c505f8a1 ("arm64: enable THP_SWAP for arm64") brings up
> THP_SWAP on ARM64, but it doesn't enable THP_SWP on hardware with
> MTE as the MTE code works with the assumption tags save/restore is
> always handling a folio with only one page.
>
> The limitation should be removed as more and more ARM64 SoCs have
> this feature. Co-existence of MTE and THP_SWAP becomes more and
> more important.
>
> This patch makes MTE tags saving support large folios, then we don't
> need to split large folios into base pages for swapping out on ARM64
> SoCs with MTE any more.
>
> arch_prepare_to_swap() should take folio rather than page as parameter
> because we support THP swap-out as a whole. It saves tags for all
> pages in a large folio.
>
> As now we are restoring tags based-on folio, in arch_swap_restore(),
> we may increase some extra loops and early-exitings while refaulting
> a large folio which is still in swapcache in do_swap_page(). In case
> a large folio has nr pages, do_swap_page() will only set the PTE of
> the particular page which is causing the page fault.
> Thus do_swap_page() runs nr times, and each time, arch_swap_restore()
> will loop nr times for those subpages in the folio. So right now the
> algorithmic complexity becomes O(nr^2).
>
> Once we support mapping large folios in do_swap_page(), extra loops
> and early-exitings will decrease while not being completely removed
> as a large folio might get partially tagged in corner cases such as,
> 1. a large folio in swapcache can be partially unmapped, thus, MTE
> tags for the unmapped pages will be invalidated;
> 2. users might use mprotect() to set MTEs on a part of a large folio.
>
> arch_thp_swp_supported() is dropped since ARM64 MTE was the only one
> who needed it.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 19 ++------------
> arch/arm64/mm/mteswap.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 12 ---------
> include/linux/pgtable.h | 2 +-
> mm/page_io.c | 2 +-
> mm/swap_slots.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 401087e8a43d..7a54750770b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -45,12 +45,6 @@
> __flush_tlb_range(vma, addr, end, PUD_SIZE, false, 1)
> #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>
> -static inline bool arch_thp_swp_supported(void)
> -{
> - return !system_supports_mte();
> -}
> -#define arch_thp_swp_supported arch_thp_swp_supported
> -
> /*
> * Outside of a few very special situations (e.g. hibernation), we always
> * use broadcast TLB invalidation instructions, therefore a spurious page
> @@ -1095,12 +1089,7 @@ static inline pmd_t pmdp_establish(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
>
> #define __HAVE_ARCH_PREPARE_TO_SWAP
> -static inline int arch_prepare_to_swap(struct page *page)
> -{
> - if (system_supports_mte())
> - return mte_save_tags(page);
> - return 0;
> -}
> +extern int arch_prepare_to_swap(struct folio *folio);
>
> #define __HAVE_ARCH_SWAP_INVALIDATE
> static inline void arch_swap_invalidate_page(int type, pgoff_t offset)
> @@ -1116,11 +1105,7 @@ static inline void arch_swap_invalidate_area(int type)
> }
>
> #define __HAVE_ARCH_SWAP_RESTORE
> -static inline void arch_swap_restore(swp_entry_t entry, struct folio *folio)
> -{
> - if (system_supports_mte())
> - mte_restore_tags(entry, &folio->page);
> -}
> +extern void arch_swap_restore(swp_entry_t entry, struct folio *folio);
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_MTE */
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mteswap.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mteswap.c
> index a31833e3ddc5..295836fef620 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mteswap.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mteswap.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,13 @@ void mte_invalidate_tags(int type, pgoff_t offset)
> mte_free_tag_storage(tags);
> }
>
> +static inline void __mte_invalidate_tags(struct page *page)
> +{
> + swp_entry_t entry = page_swap_entry(page);
> +
> + mte_invalidate_tags(swp_type(entry), swp_offset(entry));
> +}
> +
> void mte_invalidate_tags_area(int type)
> {
> swp_entry_t entry = swp_entry(type, 0);
> @@ -83,3 +90,39 @@ void mte_invalidate_tags_area(int type)
> }
> xa_unlock(&mte_pages);
> }
> +
> +int arch_prepare_to_swap(struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + long i, nr;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!system_supports_mte())
> + return 0;
> +
> + nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> + err = mte_save_tags(folio_page(folio, i));
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +
> +out:
> + while (i--)
> + __mte_invalidate_tags(folio_page(folio, i));
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +void arch_swap_restore(swp_entry_t entry, struct folio *folio)
I'm still not a fan of the fact that entry could be anywhere within folio.
> +{
> + if (system_supports_mte()) {
nit: if you do:
if (!system_supports_mte())
return;
It will be consistent with arch_prepare_to_swap() and reduce the indentation of
the main body.
> + long i, nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +
> + entry.val -= swp_offset(entry) & (nr - 1);
This assumes that folios are always stored in swap with natural alignment. Is
that definitely a safe assumption? My swap-out series is currently ensuring that
folios are swapped-out naturally aligned, but that is an implementation detail.
Your cover note for swap-in says that you could technically swap in a large
folio without it having been swapped-out large. If you chose to do that in
future, this would break, right? I don't think it's good to couple the swap
storage layout to the folio order that you want to swap into. Perhaps that's an
argument for passing each *page* to this function with its exact, corresponding
swap entry?
> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> + mte_restore_tags(entry, folio_page(folio, i));
> + entry.val++;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index de0c89105076..e04b93c43965 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -535,16 +535,4 @@ static inline int split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int new_order)
> #define split_folio_to_list(f, l) split_folio_to_list_to_order(f, l, 0)
> #define split_folio(f) split_folio_to_order(f, 0)
>
> -/*
> - * archs that select ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP but don't support THP_SWP due to
> - * limitations in the implementation like arm64 MTE can override this to
> - * false
> - */
> -#ifndef arch_thp_swp_supported
> -static inline bool arch_thp_swp_supported(void)
> -{
> - return true;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> #endif /* _LINUX_HUGE_MM_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> index e1b22903f709..bfcfe3386934 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> @@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ static inline int arch_unmap_one(struct mm_struct *mm,
> * prototypes must be defined in the arch-specific asm/pgtable.h file.
> */
> #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PREPARE_TO_SWAP
> -static inline int arch_prepare_to_swap(struct page *page)
> +static inline int arch_prepare_to_swap(struct folio *folio)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/page_io.c b/mm/page_io.c
> index ae2b49055e43..a9a7c236aecc 100644
> --- a/mm/page_io.c
> +++ b/mm/page_io.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int swap_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> * Arch code may have to preserve more data than just the page
> * contents, e.g. memory tags.
> */
> - ret = arch_prepare_to_swap(&folio->page);
> + ret = arch_prepare_to_swap(folio);
> if (ret) {
> folio_mark_dirty(folio);
> folio_unlock(folio);
> diff --git a/mm/swap_slots.c b/mm/swap_slots.c
> index 90973ce7881d..53abeaf1371d 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_slots.c
> +++ b/mm/swap_slots.c
> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ swp_entry_t folio_alloc_swap(struct folio *folio)
> entry.val = 0;
>
> if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP) && arch_thp_swp_supported())
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP))
> get_swap_pages(1, &entry, folio_nr_pages(folio));
> goto out;
> }
