Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add log related mailbox commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 2:10 AM
> To: Srinivasulu Opensrc <sthanneeru.opensrc@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
> cxl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx; dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx;
> john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Eishan Mirakhur <emirakhur@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ajay Joshi
> <ajayjoshi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ravis OpenSrc <Ravis.OpenSrc@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Srinivasulu Thanneeru <sthanneeru@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add log related mailbox commands
> 
> CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL. Do not click links or open attachments unless
> you recognize the sender and were expecting this message.
> 
> 
> Any specific reason to include linux-mm on this enabling? I suspect this
> topic is only of interest to linux-cxl. Lets drop linux-mm from a v3
> posting.

Sorry, it's a copy paste mistake.
Agreed, will drop linux-mm from V3. 
> 
> sthanneeru.opensrc@ wrote:
> > From: Srinivasulu Thanneeru <sthanneeru.opensrc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add support to expose following mailbox commands to userspace
> > for clearing and populating the Vendor debug log and
> > Component State dump log in certain scenarios,
> > allowing for the aggregation of results over time.
> 
> What is missing for me here is why the ioctl() ABI is suitable for both
> of these. The Vendor Debug Log seems straightforward to enable via
> ioctl() since there is no background operation entanglement, no
> population complexity, and no reference to other payloads.
> 
> The Component State Dump has several caveats in my mind for ioctl() not
> being a suitable ABI:
> 
> 1/ Populate Log has an unreasonable expectation that the submitter can
> monopolize the mailbox indefinitely. At least that can be solved by
> Linux only supporting automatically populated Component State Dump logs.
> 
> 2/ Automatic log population requires the caller to handle races with
> auto-population. The kernel need not export that complexity to
> userspace. This is not fatal to the proposal, but it has interactions
> with caveat 3.
> 
> 3/ The Component State Dump format wants to reference events in the
> Event Log, if the Event Log has been cleared then, per the spec, the
> Component State Dump must not reference the Event Handle. To me that
> implies that the code that clears event records must be careful to not
> destroy linkage to component state information. That suggests that the
> proper place to dump the component state log is an addendum to the
> current trace events, before that code clears the event record.
> 
> Something roughly like this:

Thank you for suggesting this approach.
Next version V3, will add "clear log" for Component State Dump separately,
as suggested bellow. Probably as a separate patch.

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> index 9adda4795eb7..498b2a0b3e76 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> @@ -941,7 +941,8 @@ static int cxl_clear_event_record(struct
> cxl_memdev_state *mds,
>  }
> 
>  static void cxl_mem_get_records_log(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
> -                                   enum cxl_event_log_type type)
> +                                   enum cxl_event_log_type type,
> +                                   struct cxl_component_state_dump *csd)
>  {
>         struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = mds->cxlds.cxlmd;
>         struct device *dev = mds->cxlds.dev;
> @@ -977,9 +978,12 @@ static void cxl_mem_get_records_log(struct
> cxl_memdev_state *mds,
>                 if (!nr_rec)
>                         break;
> 
> -               for (i = 0; i < nr_rec; i++)
> +               for (i = 0; i < nr_rec; i++) {
>                         __cxl_event_trace_record(cxlmd, type,
>                                                  &payload->records[i]);
> +                       if (is_event_referenced(csd, type, &payload->records[i]))
> +                               trace_csd(csd, ...);
> +               }
> 
>                 if (payload->flags & CXL_GET_EVENT_FLAG_OVERFLOW)
>                         trace_cxl_overflow(cxlmd, type, payload);
> 
> ...but in general this cover letter needs to comment on the long term
> suitability of the ABI.
Will add more details to cover letter in V3.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux