On 3/1/24 11:28 AM, Miaohe Lin wrote: > On 2024/3/1 5:20, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: >> This isn't my complete collection of patches to memory-failure, but >> they're the ones I have the most confidence in. I haven't done any real >> testing of this beyond compiling & running on a system without trying to >> do any memory failure injections. Is there a good test-suite I should >> run before submitting these kinds of patches? > > mm_regression[1] should be a good alternative test-suite to run. It's written by > Naoya Horiguchi and available at https://github.com/nhoriguchi/mm_regression. Any idea why these tests haven't been added to selftests or ltp? > >> >> Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) (8): >> mm/memory-failure: Remove fsdax_pgoff argument from __add_to_kill >> mm/memory-failure: Pass addr to __add_to_kill() >> mm: Return the address from page_mapped_in_vma() >> mm/memory-failure: Convert shake_page() to shake_folio() >> mm: Convert hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write to folio >> mm/memory-failure: Convert memory_failure() to use a folio >> mm/memory-failure: Convert hwpoison_user_mappings to take a folio >> mm/memory-failure: Add some folio conversions to unpoison_memory > > Thanks for your patches. I will review them as soon as possible. > >> >> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 6 +- >> include/linux/mm.h | 1 - >> include/linux/rmap.h | 2 +- >> mm/hugetlb.c | 6 +- >> mm/hwpoison-inject.c | 11 +-- >> mm/internal.h | 1 + >> mm/memory-failure.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------- >> mm/migrate.c | 2 +- >> mm/page_vma_mapped.c | 14 ++-- >> 9 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) >> > > -- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum
