09f363c7 fixed shrinker callback returns -1 when nr_to_scan is zero
for preventing excessive the slab scanning. But 635697c6 fixed the
problem, again so we can freely return -1 although nr_to_scan is zero.
So let's revert 09f363c7 because the comment added in 09f363c7 made a
unnecessary rule shrinker user should be aware of.
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/super.c | 2 +-
include/linux/shrinker.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index c2f3a1f..1c2868c 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int prune_super(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
return -1;
if (!grab_super_passive(sb))
- return !sc->nr_to_scan ? 0 : -1;
+ return -1;
if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb);
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 07ceb97..ac6b8ee 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ struct shrink_control {
* 'nr_to_scan' entries and attempt to free them up. It should return
* the number of objects which remain in the cache. If it returns -1, it means
* it cannot do any scanning at this time (eg. there is a risk of deadlock).
- * The callback must not return -1 if nr_to_scan is zero.
*
* The 'gfpmask' refers to the allocation we are currently trying to
* fulfil.
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>