On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:53:32PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote: > So, we have to handle above case for xfs. I suppose we could keep > increasing i_size if the zeroed folio is entirely outside of i_size, > make sure we could write back and allocate blocks for the > zeroed & delayed extent, something like below, any suggestions ? Sorry for being dumb, but what was the problem solved by not updating the size for ext4 again? (for unshare I can't see any reason to ever update the inode size)
