Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: don't need to save tag bit in handle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024/2/27 15:52, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (24/02/27 03:00), chengming.zhou@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> We only need to save the position (pfn + obj_idx) in the handle, don't
>> need to save tag bit in handle. So one more bit can be used as obj_idx.
> 
> [..]
> 
>> mm/zsmalloc: don't need to save tag bit in handle
> 
> Does this mean "don't need to reserve LSB for tag"?
The head of object still need to reverve LSB, to save (handle | OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG),
only the handle doesn't need to reserve LSB, which save (pfn | obj_idx).

> We still save allocated tag in the handle, that's what
> 
> 	handle |= OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG;

Yes, this result will be saved in the head of each allocated object.

> 
> does.
> 
>> Actually, the tag bit is only useful in zspage's memory space, to tell
>> if an object is allocated or not.
> 
> I'm not completely sure if I follow this sentence.

What I mean is that only the head of each allocated object need to reverve LSB,
which is used to check if allocated or not.

handle address -> handle (pfn + obj_idx) -> object: (handle | tag), real_object start

I'm not sure if this makes it clearer?

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux