On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Instead of assuming that PAGE_SHIFT is always higher than the blocklog,
> make the calculation generic so that page cache count can be calculated
> correctly for LBS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index aabb25dc3efa..69af3b06be99 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -133,9 +133,15 @@ xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count(
> {
> ASSERT(PAGE_SHIFT >= sbp->sb_blocklog);
> ASSERT(sbp->sb_blocklog >= BBSHIFT);
> + uint64_t mapping_count;
> + uint64_t bytes;
>
> + if (check_mul_overflow(nblocks, (1 << sbp->sb_blocklog), &bytes))
> + return -EFBIG;
> +
> + mapping_count = bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
max_index, not a "mapping count". Also, put this after this comment:
> /* Limited by ULONG_MAX of page cache index */
So it is obvious what the max_index we are calculating belongs to.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
