On 26.02.24 12:22, Liu Song wrote:
在 2024/2/26 16:54, David Hildenbrand 写道:
On 23.02.24 12:01, Liu Song wrote:
在 2024/2/22 20:14, David Hildenbrand 写道:
On 22.02.24 12:53, Yuanhe Shu wrote:
When transparent_hugepage is set to never by cmdline or echo, defrag
still show what it used to be and can be modified which makes user
confusing whether defrag would take effect.
Actually if transparent_hugepage is set to never, defrag will not take
effect. Just Display never and remain unchangeable to for defrag when
transparent_hugepage is set to never.
Suggested-by: Liu Song <liusong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yuanhe Shu <xiangzao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
No, I don't think we want such a dependency between both options.
You might just end up breaking existing scripts (enable defrag before
enabling THP) for no good reason.
In certain situations where khugepaged_thread is NULL, it would be more
reasonable for the value of
/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/defrag to be 0. The patch
should include a fix for this case.
Why?
We have a bunch of THP toggles. They reside in
"/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/", indicating that they are THP
specific.
Some of them are only in effect if some other toggles are set.
That is very common practice.
If you think something could be confusing, maybe clarify the doc? I
don't immediately see why any code changes are required, really.
We should explain this in the documentation, but to be honest, many
people don't read the documentation, and even after we explicitly
disable THP with transparent_hugepage=never, khugepaged/defrag is still
set to 1, and users come asking why it's still defragging. We can't
expect all users to have technical expertise, or to diligently read
through the documentation; it would obviously be best if we could avoid
user confusion altogether.
Then tell your users if a feature is enabled, other toggles that affect
that feature are ignored. Basic 1on1.
If my care engine is off but it's not in neutral, it's not suddenly
driving. And most users understand that reasoning.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb