Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 7/8] exec: Distinguish in_execve from in_exec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 08:12:56PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!

From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 90383cc07895183c75a0db2460301c2ffd912359 ]

Just to help distinguish the fs->in_exec flag from the current->in_execve
flag, add comments in check_unsafe_exec() and copy_fs() for more
context. Also note that in_execve is only used by TOMOYO now.

These are just a whitespace changes, we should not need them.

Dropped, thanks!

--
Thanks,
Sasha




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux