> From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 3:26 PM > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Kim, Jong-Sung wrote: > > > Thank you for your comment, Dave! It was not that sophisticated > > choice, but I thought that normal embedded system trying to reduce the > > BOM would have a big-enough first memblock memory region. However > > you're right. There can be exceptional systems. Then, how do you think > about following manner: > [...] > > This still has some possibilities for failure. > Can you kindly describe the possible failure path? > Please have a look at the two patches I've posted to fix this in a better > way. > I'm setting up for your elegant patches. ;-) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>