Hi,
sorry I have missed this before.
On Thu 11-01-24 21:05:30, Carlos Galo wrote:
> The current implementation of the mark_victim tracepoint provides only
> the process ID (pid) of the victim process. This limitation poses
> challenges for userspace tools that need additional information
> about the OOM victim. The association between pid and the additional
> data may be lost after the kill, making it difficult for userspace to
> correlate the OOM event with the specific process.
You are correct that post OOM all per-process information is lost. On
the other hand we do dump all this information to the kernel log. Could
you explain why that is not suitable for your purpose?
> In order to mitigate this limitation, add the following fields:
>
> - UID
> In Android each installed application has a unique UID. Including
> the `uid` assists in correlating OOM events with specific apps.
>
> - Process Name (comm)
> Enables identification of the affected process.
>
> - OOM Score
> Allows userspace to get additional insights of the relative kill
> priority of the OOM victim.
What is the oom score useful for?
Is there any reason to provide a different information from the one
reported to the kernel log?
__oom_kill_process:
pr_err("%s: Killed process %d (%s) total-vm:%lukB, anon-rss:%lukB, file-rss:%lukB, shmem-rss:%lukB, UID:%u pgtables:%lukB oom_score_adj:%hd\n",
message, task_pid_nr(victim), victim->comm, K(mm->total_vm),
K(get_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES)),
K(get_mm_counter(mm, MM_FILEPAGES)),
K(get_mm_counter(mm, MM_SHMEMPAGES)),
from_kuid(&init_user_ns, task_uid(victim)),
mm_pgtables_bytes(mm) >> 10, victim->signal->oom_score_adj);
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
