Re: excessive CPU utilization by isolate_freepages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > I doubt compaction try to migrate continuously although we have no free
> > memory.
> > Could you apply this patch and retest?
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/21/30
> 

Not sure if Jim is using memcg; if not, then this won't be helpful.

> Another possibility is that compaction is succeeding every time,
> but since we always start scanning all the way at the beginning
> and end of each zone, we waste a lot of CPU time rescanning the
> same pages (that we just filled up with moved pages) to see if
> any are free.
> 
> In short, due to the way compaction behaves right now,
> compaction + isolate_freepages are essentially quadratic.
> 
> What we need to do is remember where we left off after a
> successful compaction, so we can continue the search there
> at the next invocation.
> 

So when the free and migration scanners meet and compact_finished() == 
COMPACT_CONTINUE, loop around to the start of the zone and continue until 
you reach the pfn that it was started at?  Seems appropriate.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]