On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 9:31 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:20:40 +0800 Kairui Song <ryncsn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > When skipping swapcache for SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO, if two or more threads
> > swapin the same entry at the same time, they get different pages (A, B).
> > Before one thread (T0) finishes the swapin and installs page (A)
> > to the PTE, another thread (T1) could finish swapin of page (B),
> > swap_free the entry, then swap out the possibly modified page
> > reusing the same entry. It breaks the pte_same check in (T0) because
> > PTE value is unchanged, causing ABA problem. Thread (T0) will
> > install a stalled page (A) into the PTE and cause data corruption.
> >
> > @@ -3867,6 +3868,20 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > if (!folio) {
> > if (data_race(si->flags & SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO) &&
> > __swap_count(entry) == 1) {
> > + /*
> > + * Prevent parallel swapin from proceeding with
> > + * the cache flag. Otherwise, another thread may
> > + * finish swapin first, free the entry, and swapout
> > + * reusing the same entry. It's undetectable as
> > + * pte_same() returns true due to entry reuse.
> > + */
> > + if (swapcache_prepare(entry)) {
> > + /* Relax a bit to prevent rapid repeated page faults */
> > + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
>
> Well this is unpleasant. How often can we expect this to occur?
>
The chance is very low, using the current mainline kernel and ZRAM,
even with threads set to race on purpose using the reproducer I
provides, for 647132 page faults it occured 1528 times (~0.2%).
If I run MySQL and sysbench with 128 threads and 16G buffer pool, with
6G cgroup limit and 32G ZRAM, it occured 1372 times for 40 min,
109930201 page faults in total (~0.001%).
