On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 10:48, Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 1:14 AM Mikhail Gavrilov > <mikhail.v.gavrilov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > You are right. > > Thanks for digging into it! > > > > This [2] revert is still not merged at least I checked on 4f5e5092fdbf. > Is there any plan to merge it or find another approach? > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240118110216.2539519-2-elver@xxxxxxxxxx/ I think it's already in -mm and -next. It just takes time, which is a good thing, after all we want to let -next testing confirm nothing is wrong with it. Andrew, is this planned for the next merge window or as a "hot fix" for the current rc? Given it has the right "Fixes" tags it will make it to stable kernels eventually, but I also think that the previous "slow" version is almost unusable on big systems, so it may be worthwhile considering the current rc. Thanks, -- Marco
