On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:22:14PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, Yinghai. > > > > Sorry about the delay. I'm in bug storm somehow. :( > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 07:14:43PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > I wish we had a single call - say, memblock_die(), or whatever - so > >> > that there's a clear indication that memblock usage is done, but yeah > >> > maybe another day. Will review the patch itself. BTW, can't you post > >> > patches inline anymore? Attaching is better than corrupt but is still > >> > a bit annoying for review. > >> > >> please check the three patches: > > > > Heh, reviewing is cumbersome this way but here are my comments. > > > > * "[PATCH] memblock: free allocated memblock_reserved_regions later" > > looks okay to me. > > Good, this one should go to 3.5, right? Yes, I think so. Thank you! -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>