On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:26 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We're really close to eliminating page_size(). Just 23 callers left. > As such, it would be a mistake to name the header after it. I don't > particularly like how you're splitting up mm.h; I think the real problem > is all the code that says "Oh, I'm allocating memory, I should include > mm.h" instead of including gfp.h or slab.h. Yes, a lot of source files do that, but that mistake is not something I'm addressing in this patch series; another patch series I posted two weeks ago is about that. This series is only about making sources lighter which currently indeed need mm.h. > But if you must split it like this, at least call it folio_size.h Okay, I will rename it for v2.
