On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 04:29:28PM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote: > I thought about giving them a refcount of 1, because we only print > stacks which refcount > 1 anyways, but setting it to 0 has comes with > the advantage of catching spurious increments, should someone call > refcount_inc on those (which should not really happen). On a second thought, I think we want a refcount of 1 for these stacks at the beginning. So should we e.g: re-enter page_owner, we would increment dummy_stack's refcount. If refcount is 0, we will get a warning. -- Oscar Salvador SUSE Labs