On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:07:34 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 12.02.24 20:53, SeongJae Park wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:43:39 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> This binary is missing in the .gitignore and stays as an untracked file. > >> > >> Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > 'checkpatch.pl' complains as below: > > > > WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report > > #11: > > Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > I guess the 'Closes:' could this link? > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/AS8P193MB1285C963658008F1B2702AF7E4792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > I will add the Closes tag with the right link, thank you. Thank you :) > > > Also, note that this conflicts on mm-unstable. > > Should I use mm-unstable as basis to make sure no conflicts are introduced? DAMON selftest patches could be merged in mm-unstable or linux-kselftest depending on cases. If you rebase this on mm-unstable, it might conflict on linux-kselftest. Letting Shuah merge this on linux-kselftest and asking Linus Torvalds to fix the conflict in next merge window could be one possible option. Or, making this split out of this series, rebase on mm-unstable, and asking Andrew Morton to carry may be another option. Andrew and Shuah, may I ask your opinions? Thanks, SJ [...]
