Re: needed lru_add_drain_all() change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/27/2012 10:15 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:

>> Considering mlock and CPU pinning
>> > of realtime thread is very rare, it might be rather expensive solution.
>> > Unfortunately, I have no idea better than you suggested. :(
>> > 
>> > And looking 8891d6da17, mlock's lru_add_drain_all isn't must.
>> > If it's really bother us, couldn't we remove it?
> "grep lru_add_drain_all mm/*.c".  They're all problematic.


Yeb but I'm not sure such system modeling is good.
Potentially, It could make problem once we use workqueue of other CPU.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]