> The comment above this is justifying the flags as equivalent to those > set by the remap_pfn_range() path. That's no longer the case and the > additional flag needs to be described there. Ack. >> the comment where the bit is defined and we could use a name like >> VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED or VM_IO_ANY. Thanks, > > I'd pick VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED of those two If there is consensus on this name, I'll make the change s/VM_VFIO_ALLOW_WC/VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED.
