On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:31:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > My overall take on the fault-injection code is that there has been a > disappointing amount of uptake: I don't see many developers using them > for whitebox testing their stuff. I guess this patchset addresses > that, in a way. I added support for make-it-fail to my syscall fuzzer a while ago. (if the file exists, the child processes set it before calling the fuzzed syscall). I've not had a chance to really play with it, because I find enough problems already even without it. Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>