Re: [PATCH v2] mm/swap_state: update zswap LRU's protection range with the folio locked (fix)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/swap_state: update zswap LRU's protection range with the folio locked (fix)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 21:25:57 +0100
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chengming.zhou@xxxxxxxxx, yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240206191355.83755-1-nphamcs@gmail.com>
References: <20240206180855.3987204-1-nphamcs@gmail.com> <20240206191355.83755-1-nphamcs@gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:13:55AM -0800, Nhat Pham wrote:
> The if (folio) checks inside zswap_folio_swapin() is no longer needed.
> 
> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v2] mm/swap_state: update zswap LRU's protection range with the folio locked
  - From: Nhat Pham
- [PATCH v2] mm/swap_state: update zswap LRU's protection range with the folio locked (fix)
  - From: Nhat Pham

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] eventfd: simplify eventfd_signal()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/swap_state: update zswap LRU's protection range with the folio locked
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2] mm/swap_state: update zswap LRU's protection range with the folio locked (fix)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/swap_state: update zswap LRU's protection range with the folio locked
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux