On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:33:52AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 08:11:46AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Refactor the code left in write_cache_pages into an iterator that the > > file system can call to get the next folio for a writeback operation: > > > > struct folio *folio = NULL; > > > > while ((folio = writeback_iter(mapping, wbc, folio, &error))) { > > error = <do per-foli writeback>; > > } > > > > The twist here is that the error value is passed by reference, so that > > the iterator can restore it when breaking out of the loop. > > > > Handling of the magic AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE value stays outside the > > iterator and needs is just kept in the write_cache_pages legacy wrapper. > > in preparation for eventually killing it off. > > > > Heavily based on a for_each* based iterator from Matthew Wilcox. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/writeback.h | 4 + > > mm/page-writeback.c | 192 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) > > > ... > > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c > > index 3abb053e70580e..5fe4cdb7dbd61a 100644 > > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c > > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c > ... > > @@ -2434,69 +2434,68 @@ static struct folio *writeback_get_folio(struct address_space *mapping, > > } > > > > /** > ... > > */ > > -int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping, > > - struct writeback_control *wbc, writepage_t writepage, > > - void *data) > > +struct folio *writeback_iter(struct address_space *mapping, > > + struct writeback_control *wbc, struct folio *folio, int *error) > > { > ... > > + } else { > > wbc->nr_to_write -= folio_nr_pages(folio); > > > > - if (error == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) { > > - folio_unlock(folio); > > - error = 0; > > - } > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(*error > 0); > > Why the warning on writeback error here? It looks like new behavior, but > maybe I missed something. Otherwise the factoring LGTM. Err, sorry.. I glossed over the > 0 check and read it as < 0. Disregard, this seems reasonable to me as long as we no longer expect those AOP returns (which I'm not really clear on either, but anyways..): Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Brian > > > > > /* > > * For integrity writeback we have to keep going until we have > > @@ -2510,33 +2509,70 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping, > > * wbc->nr_to_write or encounter the first error. > > */ > > if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL) { > > - if (error && !ret) > > - ret = error; > > + if (*error && !wbc->saved_err) > > + wbc->saved_err = *error; > > } else { > > - if (error || wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) > > + if (*error || wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) > > goto done; > > } > > } > > > > - /* > > - * For range cyclic writeback we need to remember where we stopped so > > - * that we can continue there next time we are called. If we hit the > > - * last page and there is more work to be done, wrap back to the start > > - * of the file. > > - * > > - * For non-cyclic writeback we always start looking up at the beginning > > - * of the file if we are called again, which can only happen due to > > - * -ENOMEM from the file system. > > - */ > > - folio_batch_release(&wbc->fbatch); > > - if (wbc->range_cyclic) > > - mapping->writeback_index = 0; > > - return ret; > > + folio = writeback_get_folio(mapping, wbc); > > + if (!folio) { > > + /* > > + * To avoid deadlocks between range_cyclic writeback and callers > > + * that hold pages in PageWriteback to aggregate I/O until > > + * the writeback iteration finishes, we do not loop back to the > > + * start of the file. Doing so causes a page lock/page > > + * writeback access order inversion - we should only ever lock > > + * multiple pages in ascending page->index order, and looping > > + * back to the start of the file violates that rule and causes > > + * deadlocks. > > + */ > > + if (wbc->range_cyclic) > > + mapping->writeback_index = 0; > > + > > + /* > > + * Return the first error we encountered (if there was any) to > > + * the caller. > > + */ > > + *error = wbc->saved_err; > > + } > > + return folio; > > > > done: > > folio_batch_release(&wbc->fbatch); > > if (wbc->range_cyclic) > > mapping->writeback_index = folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio); > > + return NULL; > > +} > > + > > +/** > > + * write_cache_pages - walk the list of dirty pages of the given address space and write all of them. > > + * @mapping: address space structure to write > > + * @wbc: subtract the number of written pages from *@wbc->nr_to_write > > + * @writepage: function called for each page > > + * @data: data passed to writepage function > > + * > > + * Return: %0 on success, negative error code otherwise > > + * > > + * Note: please use writeback_iter() instead. > > + */ > > +int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping, > > + struct writeback_control *wbc, writepage_t writepage, > > + void *data) > > +{ > > + struct folio *folio = NULL; > > + int error; > > + > > + while ((folio = writeback_iter(mapping, wbc, folio, &error))) { > > + error = writepage(folio, wbc, data); > > + if (error == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) { > > + folio_unlock(folio); > > + error = 0; > > + } > > + } > > + > > return error; > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(write_cache_pages); > > -- > > 2.39.2 > > > > > >