Re: [PATCH] memcg: first step towards hierarchical controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 07:31:21PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 06:11 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> >I find the warning message a bit terse.  Maybe include something like
> >"restructure the cgroup directory structure to match your accounting
> >requirements or complain to (linux-mm, cgroups list etc.)  if not
> >possible"
> 
> How about:
> 
> WARN_ONCE(!parent_memcg && memcg->use_hierarchy,
>    "Non-hierarchical memcg is considered for deprecation\n"
>    "Please consider reorganizing your tree to work with hierarchical
> accounting\n"
>    "If you have any reason not to, let us know at
> cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\n");

Sounds good to me, thanks!

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]