I mistakenly broke the subject of the patch. I will send the complete one
again.
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 12:49:46 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> kdamond_apply_schemes() checks apply intervals of schemes and avoid
> further applying any schemes if no scheme passed its apply interval.
> However, the following schemes applying function,
> damon_do_apply_schemes() iterates all schemes without the apply interval
> check. As a result, the shortest apply interval is applied to all
> schemes. Fix the problem by checking the apply interval in
> damon_do_apply_schemes().
>
> Fixes: 42f994b71404 ("mm/damon/core: implement scheme-specific apply interval")
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 6.7.x
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/damon/core.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 0c144fb466b8..f444734cc613 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -1064,6 +1064,9 @@ static void damon_do_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c,
> damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
> struct damos_quota *quota = &s->quota;
>
> + if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
> + continue;
> +
> if (!s->wmarks.activated)
> continue;
>
> @@ -1216,10 +1219,6 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
> if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
> continue;
>
> - s->next_apply_sis +=
> - (s->apply_interval_us ? s->apply_interval_us :
> - c->attrs.aggr_interval) / sample_interval;
> -
> if (!s->wmarks.activated)
> continue;
>
> @@ -1235,6 +1234,14 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
> damon_for_each_region_safe(r, next_r, t)
> damon_do_apply_schemes(c, t, r);
> }
> +
> + damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
> + if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
> + continue;
> + s->next_apply_sis +=
> + (s->apply_interval_us ? s->apply_interval_us :
> + c->attrs.aggr_interval) / sample_interval;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.39.2
