Sorry, please ignore this patch due to an incorrect title. I will resend the correct one
> On Feb 5, 2024, at 10:28, Hao Ge <gehao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> too_many_isolated should return bool which with the same name and
> similar functions in mm/compaction.c already returned bool
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 4f9c854ce6cc..143e4b8e8821 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1744,17 +1744,17 @@ bool folio_isolate_lru(struct folio *folio)
> * the LRU list will go small and be scanned faster than necessary, leading to
> * unnecessary swapping, thrashing and OOM.
> */
> -static int too_many_isolated(struct pglist_data *pgdat, int file,
> +static bool too_many_isolated(struct pglist_data *pgdat, int file,
> struct scan_control *sc)
> {
> unsigned long inactive, isolated;
> bool too_many;
>
> if (current_is_kswapd())
> - return 0;
> + return false;
>
> if (!writeback_throttling_sane(sc))
> - return 0;
> + return false;
>
> if (file) {
> inactive = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> --
> 2.25.1
