On 2024/2/4 15:44, Muchun Song wrote:
I don't think it is a clear way to fix this. If someone want to use PADATA in a non-SMP system, he should be carefully to handle the non-SMP case himself. I think the better way is to make PADATA handle the non-SMP case, I think it should be easy for it, which could just call ->thread_fn() many times instead of creating many threads in the non-SMP case. Thanks.
Sounds good, I'll take a look at padata and send a new patch.
