On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 17:52 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > > The thing you propose, the double search, once for len, and once for len > > +align-1 doesn't guarantee you'll find a hole. All holes of len might be > > mis-aligned but the len+align-1 search might overlook a hole of suitable > > size and alignment, you'd have to search the entire range: [len, len > > +align-1], and that's somewhat silly. > > This may still be good enough. OK, as long as this is clearly mentioned in a comment near there. It just annoys me that I cannot come up with anything better :-) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href