On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 03:49:03PM +0000, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> When the shrinker encounter an existing folio in swap cache, it means
> we are shrinking into the warmer region. We should terminate shrinking
> if we're in the dynamic shrinker context.
>
> This patch add LRU_STOP to support this, to avoid overshrinking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
LGTM with one comment below.
Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/list_lru.h | 1 +
> mm/list_lru.c | 3 +++
> mm/zswap.c | 4 +++-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h
> index f2882a820690..5633e970144b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/list_lru.h
> +++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ enum lru_status {
> LRU_SKIP, /* item cannot be locked, skip */
> LRU_RETRY, /* item not freeable. May drop the lock
> internally, but has to return locked. */
> + LRU_STOP, /* stop lru list walking */
nit: Should we add "May drop the lock internally, but has to return
locked" like LRU_RETRY and LRU_REMOVED_RETRY?
> };
>
> struct list_lru_one {
[..]
