Re: [linux-next:master] [block/mq] 574e7779cf: fio.write_iops -72.9% regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/1/24 12:18 AM, Oliver Sang wrote:
> hi, Jens Axboe,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 11:42:46AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/31/24 11:17 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 1/31/24 07:42, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>> kernel test robot noticed a -72.9% regression of fio.write_iops on:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> commit: 574e7779cf583171acb5bf6365047bb0941b387c ("block/mq-deadline: use separate insertion lists")
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>>>>
>>>> testcase: fio-basic
>>>> test machine: 64 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6346 CPU @ 3.10GHz (Ice Lake) with 256G memory
>>>> parameters:
>>>>
>>>>     runtime: 300s
>>>>     disk: 1HDD
>>>>     fs: xfs
>>>>     nr_task: 100%
>>>>     test_size: 128G
>>>>     rw: write
>>>>     bs: 4k
>>>>     ioengine: io_uring
>>>>     direct: direct
>>>>     cpufreq_governor: performance
>>>
>>> The actual test is available in this file:
>>> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240131/202401312320.a335db14-oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx/repro-script
>>>
>>> I haven't found anything in that file for disabling merging. Merging
>>> requests decreases IOPS. Does this perhaps mean that this test is
>>> broken?
>>
>> It's hard to know as nothing in this email or links include the actual
>> output of the job...
> 
> I attached a dmesg and 2 outputs while running tests on 574e7779cf.
> not sure if they are helpful?

Both fio outputs is all I need, but I only see one of them attached?

>> But if it's fio IOPS, then those are application side and don't
>> necessarily correlate to drive IOPS due to merging. Eg for fio iops,
>> if it does 4k sequential and we merge to 128k, then the fio perceived
>> iops will be 32 times larger than the device side.
>>
>> I'll take a look, but seems like there might be something there. By
>> inserting into the other list, the request is also not available for
>> merging. And the test in question does single IOs at the time.
> 
> if you have any debug patch want us to run, please just let us know.
> it will be our great pleasure!

Thanks, might take you up on that, probably won't have time for this
until next week however.

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux