On 2024/2/1 06:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 1/31/24 23:25, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 2:20 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was looking into moving eventfs_inode into a slab, and after cutting and
>>> pasting the tracefs allocator:
>>>
>>> tracefs_inode_cachep = kmem_cache_create("tracefs_inode_cache",
>>> sizeof(struct tracefs_inode),
>>> 0, (SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|
>>> SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|
>>> SLAB_ACCOUNT),
>>> init_once);
>>>
>>> I figured I should know what those slab flags mean. I also looked at what
>>> others in fs use for their slabs. The above is rather common (which I
>>> probably just copied from another file system), but I wanted to know what
>>> they are for.
>>>
>>> When I got to SLAB_MEM_SPREAD, I found that it's a common flag and there's
>>> a lot of caches that just set that and nothing else.
>>>
>>> But I couldn't find how it was used.
>>>
>>> Then I found this commit:
>>>
>>> 16a1d968358a ("mm/slab: remove mm/slab.c and slab_def.h")
>>>
>>> Which I think removed the only use case of SLAB_MEM_SPREAD.
>>>
>>> $ git grep SLAB_MEM_SPREAD mm
>>> mm/slab.h: SLAB_MEM_SPREAD | \
>>>
>>> That's all I find in the mm directory.
>>>
>>> Is it obsolete now? Can we delete it? Maybe there's other SLAB_* flags that
>>> are no longer used. I don't know, I haven't audited them.
>>
>> Perhaps cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread() as well.
>
> Yep, good find. Show how obscure mm/slab.c was in the end :)
>
> CCing a few more new people who did slab changes recently, who'd like some
> low hanging fruit of negative diffcount? :)
Thanks for CCing, I can prepare the patch to do it. IIUC, what I need to do is:
1. delete SLAB_MEM_SPREAD and all its uses.
2. cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread() is not used anymore, should we keep the interface?
Since it's the interface exported by cgroup-v1 "cpuset.memory_spread_slab".
