Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/khugepaged: bypassing unnecessary scans with MMF_DISABLE_THP check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:12 AM Lance Yang <ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey Michal,
>
> Thanks for taking time to review!
>
> On some servers within our company, we deploy a
> daemon responsible for monitoring and updating
> local applications. Some applications prefer not to
> use THP, so the daemon calls prctl to disable THP
> before fork/exec. Conversely, for other applications,
> the daemon calls prctl to enable THP before fork/exec.
>
> Ideally, the daemon should invoke prctl after the fork,
> but its current implementation follows the described
> approach.

In the Go standard library, there is no direct encapsulation
of the fork system call. Instead, fork and execve are
combined into one through syscall.ForkExec.

>
> BR,
> Lance
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:28 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon 29-01-24 13:45:51, Lance Yang wrote:
> > > khugepaged scans the entire address space in the
> > > background for each given mm, looking for
> > > opportunities to merge sequences of basic pages
> > > into huge pages. However, when an mm is inserted
> > > to the mm_slots list, and the MMF_DISABLE_THP flag
> > > is set later, this scanning process becomes
> > > unnecessary for that mm and can be skipped to avoid
> > > redundant operations, especially in scenarios with
> > > a large address space.
> >
> > Is this a real problem? I thought that the prctl is called
> > on the parent before fork/exec. Or are you aware of any
> > applications which do call prctl late enough that the race
> > would be actually observable?
> > --
> > Michal Hocko
> > SUSE Labs





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux