On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:21:01PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > I have an application that does the following: > > * copy the state of all controllers attached to a hierarchy > * replicate it as a child of the current level. > > I would expect writes to the files to mostly succeed, since they > are inheriting sane values from parents. > > But that is not the case for use_hierarchy. If it is set to 0, we > succeed ok. If we're set to 1, the value of the file is automatically > set to 1 in the children, but if userspace tries to write the > very same 1, it will fail. That same situation happens if we > set use_hierarchy, create a child, and then try to write 1 again. > > Now, there is no reason whatsoever for failing to write a value > that is already there. It doesn't even match the comments, that > states: > > /* If parent's use_hierarchy is set, we can't make any modifications > * in the child subtrees... > > since we are not changing anything. > > The following patch tests the new value against the one we're storing, > and automatically return 0 if we're not proposing a change. A bit of delta but is there any chance we can either deprecate .use_hierarhcy or at least make it global toggle instead of subtree thing? This seems needlessly complicated. :( -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>