On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:55:35PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 04:15 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
> > Because those architectures will draw their stacks directly from
> > the page allocator, rather than the slab cache, we can directly
> > pass __GFP_KMEMCG flag, and issue the corresponding free_pages.
> >
> > This code path is taken when the architecture doesn't define
> > CONFIG_ARCH_THREAD_INFO_ALLOCATOR (only ia64 seems to), and has
> > THREAD_SIZE >= PAGE_SIZE. Luckily, most - if not all - of the
> > remaining architectures fall in this category.
> >
> > This will guarantee that every stack page is accounted to the memcg
> > the process currently lives on, and will have the allocations to fail
> > if they go over limit.
> >
> > For the time being, I am defining a new variant of THREADINFO_GFP, not
> > to mess with the other path. Once the slab is also tracked by memcg,
> > we can get rid of that flag.
> >
> > Tested to successfully protect against :(){ :|:& };:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxxx>
Frederic, does this (with proper slab accounting added later) achieve
what you wanted with the task counter?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>