On Fri 26-01-24 17:07:56, Kent Overstreet wrote: > If we're using PF_MEMALLOC, we might have a fallback and might not to > warn about a failing allocation - thus we need a PF_* equivalent of > __GFP_NOWARN. Could you be more specific about the user? Is this an allocation from the reclaim path or an explicit PF_MEMALLOC one? It would be also really helpful to explain why GFP_NOWARN cannot be used directly. Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
