Re: [PATCH 3/3] rust: add abstraction for `struct page`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 1:47 AM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 11:20:23AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > +    /// Maps the page and reads from it into the given buffer.
> > +    ///
> > +    /// # Safety
> > +    ///
> > +    /// Callers must ensure that `dest` is valid for writing `len` bytes.
> > +    pub unsafe fn read(&self, dest: *mut u8, offset: usize, len: usize) -> Result {
> > +        self.with_pointer_into_page(offset, len, move |from_ptr| {
> > +            // SAFETY: If `with_pointer_into_page` calls into this closure, then
> > +            // it has performed a bounds check and guarantees that `from_ptr` is
> > +            // valid for `len` bytes.
> > +            unsafe { ptr::copy(from_ptr, dest, len) };
> > +            Ok(())
> > +        })
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /// Maps the page and writes into it from the given buffer.
> > +    ///
> > +    /// # Safety
> > +    ///
> > +    /// Callers must ensure that `src` is valid for reading `len` bytes.
> > +    pub unsafe fn write(&self, src: *const u8, offset: usize, len: usize) -> Result {
>
> Use a slice like type as `src` maybe? Then the function can be safe:
>
>         pub fn write<S: AsRef<[u8]>>(&self, src: S, offset: usize) -> Result
>
> Besides, since `Page` impl `Sync`, shouldn't this `write` and the
> `fill_zero` be a `&mut self` function? Or make them both `unsafe`
> because of potential race and add some safety requirement?

Ideally, we don't want data races with these methods to be UB. They
could be mapped into the address space of a userspace process.

Alice





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux