On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 4:55 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 03:59:48PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote: > > loop more mm and fs guys for more comments > > I agree with everything Damien said. But also ... ok, I will find a way to solve this problem. > > > > +bool BIO_ADD_FOLIO(struct bio *bio, struct folio *folio, size_t len, > > > + size_t off) > > You don't add any users of these functions. It's hard to assess whether > this is the right API when there are no example users. Actually, the code has been tested on ext4 and f2fs by patchv2 on a v6.6 6GB android system where I get the test result posted on the commit message. These APIs is to keep block layer clean and wrap things up for fs. > > > > + activity += (bio->bi_vcnt + 1 <= IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY && > > > + PageWorkingset(&folio->page)) ? 1 : 0; > > folio_test_workingset(). > > > > + return bio_add_page(bio, &folio->page, len, off) > 0; > > bio_add_folio(). > > > > +int BIO_ADD_PAGE(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, > > > + unsigned int len, unsigned int offset) > > > +{ > > > + int class, level, hint, activity; > > > + > > > + if (bio_add_page(bio, page, len, offset) > 0) { > > > + class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bio->bi_ioprio); > > > + level = IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(bio->bi_ioprio); > > > + hint = IOPRIO_PRIO_HINT(bio->bi_ioprio); > > > + activity = IOPRIO_PRIO_ACTIVITY(bio->bi_ioprio); > > > + activity += (bio->bi_vcnt <= IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY && PageWorkingset(page)) ? 1 : 0; > > > + bio->bi_ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE_ACTIVITY(class, level, hint, activity); > > > + } > > why are BIO_ADD_PAGE and BIO_ADD_FOLIO so very different from each > other? These two API just repeat the same thing that bio_add_page and bio_add_folio do. > > > > static __always_inline __u16 ioprio_value(int prioclass, int priolevel, > > > - int priohint) > > > + int priohint) > > why did you change this whitespace? > > > > { > > > if (IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(prioclass, IOPRIO_NR_CLASSES) || > > > - IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(priolevel, IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS) || > > > - IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(priohint, IOPRIO_NR_HINTS)) > > > + IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(priolevel, IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS) || > > > + IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(priohint, IOPRIO_NR_HINTS)) > > ditto These white spaces are trimmed by vim, I will change them back in next version. > > > > return IOPRIO_CLASS_INVALID << IOPRIO_CLASS_SHIFT; > > > > > > return (prioclass << IOPRIO_CLASS_SHIFT) | > > > (priohint << IOPRIO_HINT_SHIFT) | priolevel; > > > } > > > - > > more gratuitous whitespace change >