(2012/06/25 18:21), Glauber Costa wrote: > I have an application that does the following: > > * copy the state of all controllers attached to a hierarchy > * replicate it as a child of the current level. > > I would expect writes to the files to mostly succeed, since they > are inheriting sane values from parents. > > But that is not the case for use_hierarchy. If it is set to 0, we > succeed ok. If we're set to 1, the value of the file is automatically > set to 1 in the children, but if userspace tries to write the > very same 1, it will fail. That same situation happens if we > set use_hierarchy, create a child, and then try to write 1 again. > > Now, there is no reason whatsoever for failing to write a value > that is already there. It doesn't even match the comments, that > states: > > /* If parent's use_hierarchy is set, we can't make any modifications > * in the child subtrees... > > since we are not changing anything. > > The following patch tests the new value against the one we're storing, > and automatically return 0 if we're not proposing a change. > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> > CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> Hm. Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>