Re: [PATCH net] tcp: add sanity checks to rx zerocopy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fixing email address for linux-mm.

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:07:50PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:33:17AM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > @@ -1786,7 +1786,17 @@ static skb_frag_t *skb_advance_to_frag(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 offset_skb,
> >  
> >  static bool can_map_frag(const skb_frag_t *frag)
> >  {
> > -	return skb_frag_size(frag) == PAGE_SIZE && !skb_frag_off(frag);
> > +	struct page *page;
> > +
> > +	if (skb_frag_size(frag) != PAGE_SIZE || skb_frag_off(frag))
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	page = skb_frag_page(frag);
> > +
> > +	if (PageCompound(page) || page->mapping)
> > +		return false;
> 
> I'm not entirely sure why you're testing PageCompound here.  If a driver
> allocates a compound page, we'd still want to be able to insert it,
> right?
> 
> I have a feeling that we want to fix this in the VM layer.  There are
> some weird places calling vm_insert_page() and we should probably make
> them all fail.
> 
> Something like this, perhaps?
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 1a60faad2e49..ae0abab56d38 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1871,6 +1871,10 @@ static int insert_page_into_pte_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *pte,
>  
>  	if (!pte_none(ptep_get(pte)))
>  		return -EBUSY;
> +	if (folio->mapping &&
> +	    ((addr - vma->vm_start) / PAGE_SIZE + vma->vm_pgoff) !=
> +	    (folio->index + folio_page_idx(folio, page)))
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	/* Ok, finally just insert the thing.. */
>  	folio_get(folio);
>  	inc_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, mm_counter_file(folio));
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux