Re: Accounting problem of MIGRATE_ISOLATED freed page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/23/2012 11:59 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> 
> One more.
> 
> 
>> +/*
>> + * NOTE:
>> + * Don't use set_pageblock_migratetype(page, MIGRATE_ISOLATE) direclty.
>> + * Instead, use {un}set_pageblock_isolate.
>> + */
>>  void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype)
>>  {
>>         if (unlikely(page_group_by_mobility_disabled))
> 
> I don't think we need this comment. please just add BUG_ON.


It adds new condition check in __rmqueue_fallback.
If it's okay, no problem.

But as you know, calling MIGRATE_ISOLATE is very very rare and we can
make sure it's no problem on existing code. So the problem is future
user and I hope they can look at the code comment before using and we mm
have strong review system rather than other subsystem, I believe. :)

If you can't agree, I am willing to add BUG_ON but not sure others
like it. (Especially, Mel).



-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]