Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove stale comment __folio_mark_dirty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove stale comment __folio_mark_dirty
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:07:05 +0000
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, hcochran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240123183332.876854-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
References: <20240123183332.876854-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> <20240123183332.876854-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 02:33:32AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> The __folio_mark_dirty will not mark inode dirty any longer. Remove the
> stale comment of it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] Fix and cleanups to page-writeback
  - From: Kemeng Shi
- [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove stale comment __folio_mark_dirty
  - From: Kemeng Shi

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 10/11] mm/memory: ignore dirty/accessed/soft-dirty bits in folio_pte_batch()
Next by Date: [PATCH v1] mm/userfaultfd: UFFDIO_MOVE implementation should use ptep_get()
Previous by thread: [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove stale comment __folio_mark_dirty
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix and cleanups to page-writeback
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux