Reviewed-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@xxxxxxxx> Without this fix, testing the latest exfat with xfstests, test cases generic/029 and generic/030 will fail. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx <owner-linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx> On Behalf > Of David Hildenbrand > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 1:18 AM > To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx; David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ryan > Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>; Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH v1] mm/memory: fix folio_set_dirty() vs. folio_mark_dirty() in > zap_pte_range() > > The correct folio replacement for "set_page_dirty()" is > "folio_mark_dirty()", not "folio_set_dirty()". Using the latter won't > properly inform the FS using the dirty_folio() callback. > > This has been found by code inspection, but likely this can result in > some real trouble when zapping dirty PTEs that point at clean pagecache > folios. > > Reported-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx> > Closes: > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2445cedb-61fb-422c-8bfb-caf0a2beed62@xxxxxxx > Fixes: c46265030b0f ("mm/memory: page_remove_rmap() -> > folio_remove_rmap_pte()") > Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx> > --- > mm/memory.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > index 7e1f4849463aa..89bcae0b224d6 100644 > --- a/mm/memory.c > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct > mmu_gather *tlb, > delay_rmap = 0; > if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) { > if (pte_dirty(ptent)) { > - folio_set_dirty(folio); > + folio_mark_dirty(folio); > if (tlb_delay_rmap(tlb)) { > delay_rmap = 1; > force_flush = 1;
