On 12.01.24 07:16, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > On 1/10/24 3:15 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >> On 1/10/24 11:49 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>> On 1/6/24 2:13 AM, Jiaqi Yan wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 10:27 PM Muhammad Usama Anjum >>>> <usama.anjum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to convert this test to TAP as I think the failures sometimes go >>>>> unnoticed on CI systems if we only depend on the return value of the >>>>> application. I've enabled the following configurations which aren't already >>>>> present in tools/testing/selftests/mm/config: >>>>> CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE=y >>>>> CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT=m > #regzbot title: hugetlbfs hwpoison handling > #regzbot introduced: a08c7193e4f1 > #regzbot monitor: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240111191655.295530-1-sidhartha.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx #regzbot fix: fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c: mm/memory-failure.c: fix hugetlbfs hwpoison handling #regzbot ignore-activity Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
