On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:35 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > @@ -493,45 +471,47 @@ static struct zswap_entry *zswap_search(struct zswap_tree *tree, pgoff_t offset)
> > static int zswap_insert(struct zswap_tree *tree, struct zswap_entry *entry,
> > struct zswap_entry **dupentry)
> > {
> > - struct rb_root *root = &tree->rbroot;
> > - struct rb_node **link = &root->rb_node, *parent = NULL;
> > - struct zswap_entry *myentry, *old;
> > - pgoff_t myentry_offset, entry_offset = swp_offset(entry->swpentry);
> > -
> > -
> > - while (*link) {
> > - parent = *link;
> > - myentry = rb_entry(parent, struct zswap_entry, rbnode);
> > - myentry_offset = swp_offset(myentry->swpentry);
> > - if (myentry_offset > entry_offset)
> > - link = &(*link)->rb_left;
> > - else if (myentry_offset < entry_offset)
> > - link = &(*link)->rb_right;
> > - else {
> > - old = xa_load(&tree->xarray, entry_offset);
> > - BUG_ON(old != myentry);
> > - *dupentry = myentry;
> > + struct zswap_entry *e;
> > + pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(entry->swpentry);
> > + XA_STATE(xas, &tree->xarray, offset);
> > +
> > + do {
> > + xas_lock_irq(&xas);
> > + do {
> > + e = xas_load(&xas);
> > + if (xa_is_zero(e))
> > + e = NULL;
> > + } while (xas_retry(&xas, e));
> > + if (xas_valid(&xas) && e) {
> > + xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
> > + *dupentry = e;
> > return -EEXIST;
> > }
> > - }
> > - rb_link_node(&entry->rbnode, parent, link);
> > - rb_insert_color(&entry->rbnode, root);
> > - old = xa_store(&tree->xarray, entry_offset, entry, GFP_KERNEL);
> > - return 0;
> > + xas_store(&xas, entry);
> > + xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
> > + } while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
> > + return xas_error(&xas);
>
> I think using the xas_* APIs can be avoided here. The only reason we
> need it is that we want to check if there's an existing entry first,
> and return -EEXIST. However, in that case, the caller will replace it
> anyway (and do some operations on the dupentry):
>
> while (zswap_rb_insert(&tree->rbroot, entry, &dupentry) == -EEXIST) {
> WARN_ON(1);
> zswap_duplicate_entry++;
> zswap_invalidate_entry(tree, dupentry);
> }
>
> So I think we can do something like this in zswap_insert() instead:
>
> dupentry = xa_store(..);
> if (WARN_ON(dupentry)) {
> zswap_duplicate_entry++;
> zswap_invalidate_entry(tree, dupentry);
> }
If this is doable, I think we can return xa_store(..) and keep the
logic in the caller. I think there's a chance
zswap_{search/insert/erase} may end up being very thin wrappers around
xa_{load/store/erase}, and we may be able to remove them completely.
Let's see how it goes.
