Re: [RESEND PATCH V2] mm: page_alloc: unreserve highatomic page blocks before oom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "quic_charante@xxxxxxxxxxx" <quic_charante@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V2] mm: page_alloc: unreserve highatomic page blocks before oom
From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:23:58 +0000
Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
Cc: "david@xxxxxxxxxx" <david@xxxxxxxxxx>, "mhocko@xxxxxxxx" <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx" <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "quic_pkondeti@xxxxxxxxxxx" <quic_pkondeti@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "vbabka@xxxxxxx" <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, "stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "quic_cgoldswo@xxxxxxxxxxx" <quic_cgoldswo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1700823445-27531-1-git-send-email-quic_charante@quicinc.com>
User-agent: Evolution 3.50.1

Could this patch be backported to stable? I have seen similar OOMs with
reserved_highatomic:4096KB

Upstream commit: 04c8716f7b0075def05dc05646e2408f318167d2

  Jocke

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RESEND PATCH V2] mm: page_alloc: unreserve highatomic page blocks before oom
  - From: Greg KH

References:
- [RESEND PATCH V2] mm: page_alloc: unreserve highatomic page blocks before oom
  - From: Charan Teja Kalla

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm/zswap: Improve with alloc_workqueue() call
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/zswap: optimize the scalability of zswap rb-tree
Previous by thread: Re: [RESEND PATCH V2] mm: page_alloc: unreserve highatomic page blocks before oom
Next by thread: Re: [RESEND PATCH V2] mm: page_alloc: unreserve highatomic page blocks before oom
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]